Philosophy

QUESTION:  “Suppose someone claimed to have a device that destroyed people’s souls, but otherwise had no discernible effect on that person.  How would you evaluate such a claim? Is the claim that people have souls any more plausible?  Why or why not? “

THINGS TO KEEP ON MIND:

 

  1. Evidence of critical thought
  2. Evidence of a complete understanding of the relevant theories and concepts
  3. Grammar, spelling and length 
  4. The answer must be 350 Words.
  5. NO WORK CITED PAGES OR NOTHING.
  6. ITS A FREE WRITING QUESTION SO PLEASE NO PLAIGIARISM
  7. MUST BE AN ANSWER OF YOUR OWN.

 

Leave a Reply